Uncertainty, Confidence, and Hallucination in Large Language Models
Published:
How to Spot When Your Large Language Model is Misleading You
Table of Content
LLM Is Just Making Stuff Up
Detecting Deception: Tools and Methods for Identifying LLM Falsehoods
Score-based Approaches for Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs
Heuristic Uncertainty as a Clue
Quantifying Uncertainty with Information Theory
Model-based Hallucination Detection
LLM as Evaluators
Simple Conformal Predictors
Final Thoughts: The Future of LLM Hallucination Detection
LLM Is Just Making Stuff Up
Ever have a conversation with a large language model that sounds super confident, spitting out facts that seem…well, a little fishy? 🐟 You’re not alone. One of the biggest challenges in working with Large Language Models (LLMs) is verifying the correctness of their output. Despite their advanced capabilities, LLMs can sometimes generate information that appears accurate but is fabricated. This phenomenon, known as 👉 hallucination, can lead to misinformation and erode trust in AI systems. Hallucination in AI is not a new phenomenon. Deep learning models, in general, are notorious for their over-confidence in predictions. For instance, in classification tasks, these models can assign a very high probability to a label prediction, even when the prediction is incorrect [1]. Deep learning models can be misleading in how powerful they truly are.